
Condition 8549: The Designated Areas List Has Been Remade for 2026
On 22 September 2026 the Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 replaced IMMI 16/044. The areas are identical, the instrument number is not — and if you hold a provisional skilled visa with condition 8549, this is the postcode list your visa points at.
On 22 September 2026 the Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 replaced IMMI 16/044. The areas are identical, the instrument number is not — and if you hold a provisional skilled visa with condition 8549, this is the postcode list your visa points at.
- The Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 (LIN 26/004, F2026L01255) commenced 22 September 2026 and repealed IMMI 16/044
- The designated areas themselves are unchanged — the ES says the table was "remade in substantially the same form"
- It was remade because IMMI 16/044 was scheduled to sunset on 1 October 2026 under s 50 of the Legislation Act 2003
- Condition 8549 requires a holder to live, work AND study in a designated area — relevant to subclasses including the 489 and 887
- All of SA, Tasmania, Victoria, WA, the ACT, the NT and Norfolk Island qualify; only NSW and Queensland are cut by postcode
- "Designated area" (8549, 489/887) is a different concept from "designated regional area" (491/494) — do not mix the lists
- From 22 September 2026, citing IMMI 16/044 means citing a repealed instrument
On 21 September 2026 the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship registered the Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 — departmental reference LIN 26/004, register ID F2026L01255. It commenced the following day, 22 September 2026, and it repealed Designated Areas 2016/044 (IMMI 16/044) in its entirety.
If you hold a provisional skilled visa with condition 8549 attached, that instrument is the list your visa condition points at. So the first question is the obvious one: did the areas change?
No. And that is worth stating before anything else, because a new instrument number attached to the words "designated areas" is exactly the kind of thing that sends people into a panic about a house they have already bought or a job they have already taken.
The instrument at a glance
The Explanatory Statement says it twice. Section 6 "has been remade in substantially the same form as section 2 of the repealed Designated Areas 2016/044", and the Schedule 1 table "has been remade in substantially the same form as the table under the Schedule of the repealed IMMI 16/044". Same postcodes, same States, same Territories — new instrument carrying them.
What condition 8549 actually requires
Condition 8549 is a visa condition. In the Explanatory Statement's own words, a visa holder subject to it "must live, work and study in an area specified as a designated area of Australia".
All three verbs matter. It is not a "live there" condition with work and study as optional extras — the condition names living, working and studying together, and it points at the same geographic list for all three.
The Explanatory Statement describes condition 8549 as "relevant to the operation of some visa subclasses, including Subclass 489 and Subclass 887". That word including is doing real work: the list is not closed. If you hold an older provisional skilled visa — a 475, 487, 495 or 496, for example — do not assume the condition is irrelevant to you because this article leads with the 489.
Visa conditions are imposed case by case, and no article can tell you which ones are attached to your grant. Open your visa grant notification, or check VEVO. If 8549 is listed, this instrument is your geographic list. If it is not, this instrument does not govern where you live — something else in your grant might.
The designated areas — the full Schedule 1 list
This is the operative content of the instrument: the table in Schedule 1, reproduced in full. Column 1 names the State or Territory; Column 2 gives the postcodes, or says the whole State or Territory qualifies.
| # | Area | Postcode / State / Territory |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Australian Capital Territory | Entire Territory |
| 2 | New South Wales (excluding Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong) | 2311 to 2312 2328 to 2333 2336 to 2490 2535 to 2551 2575 to 2739 2787 to 2898 |
| 3 | Norfolk Island | Entire Territory |
| 4 | Northern Territory | Entire Territory |
| 5 | Queensland (excluding Brisbane metropolitan area) | 4019 to 4028 4037 to 4050 4079 to 4100 4114 4118 4124 to 4150 4158 to 4168 4180 to 4899 |
| 6 | South Australia | Entire State |
| 7 | Tasmania | Entire State |
| 8 | Victoria | Entire State |
| 9 | Western Australia | Entire State |
Schedule 1, Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 (F2026L01255), registered 21 September 2026. Reproduced for reference — always confirm against the instrument itself before acting.
Two features of that table surprise people every time.
First, four States and three Territories qualify in their entirety — South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia, plus the ACT, the Northern Territory and Norfolk Island. Victoria in full means Melbourne is inside a designated area. Western Australia in full means Perth is too.
Second, only New South Wales and Queensland are cut by postcode, and the exclusions are named in Column 1: Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong for NSW; the Brisbane metropolitan area for Queensland.
These are two different legal terms pointing at two different instruments, and mixing them up is the most expensive mistake available here. "Designated area" comes from regulation 1.03 and is what this instrument specifies — it drives condition 8549 for subclasses including the 489 and 887, and it treats all of Victoria and all of Western Australia as qualifying. "Designated regional area" is the separate concept used for the modern subclass 491 and 494 visas, and it excludes Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. If you read a 491 postcode list and applied it to an 8549 obligation, you have the wrong map.
This is a sunsetting remake, not a policy change
Legislative instruments do not live forever. Under section 50 of the Legislation Act 2003, they automatically sunset — they simply cease to have effect — roughly ten years after they are made, unless they are remade or preserved.
The Explanatory Statement is explicit about the timing: "IMMI 16/044 is scheduled to sunset on 1 October 2026 in accordance with section 50 of the Legislation Act." Had nothing been done, the definition of "designated area" would have had no instrument behind it from that date, and condition 8549 would have pointed at an empty list.
The remaining paperwork confirms the housekeeping character of the exercise:
- No consultation. The ES records that the instrument "is of a minor or machinery nature" and that external consultation "was not considered necessary or appropriate to undertake".
- Exempt from disallowance under section 42 of the Legislation Act 2003, because it is made under Part 1 of the Migration Regulations — paragraph (b) of item 20 in regulation 10 of the Legislation (Exemptions and Other Matters) Regulation 2015.
- No Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is required, as a consequence of that disallowance exemption.
None of that is unusual, and none of it is sinister. It is what a well-run sunsetting programme looks like: the department noticed an instrument was about to expire, remade it in the same terms, and repealed the original.
What this means if you are heading for an 887
The Explanatory Statement sets out the chain plainly. A Subclass 489 holder may apply for permanent residence by making a Subclass 887 application if they satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements — and "compliance with condition 8549 is relevant to eligibility for the grant of a Subclass 887 visa if the applicant applies for that visa on the basis of holding a visa for which condition 8549 is imposed."
Read that carefully, because it is narrower than the shorthand people use. Condition 8549 compliance is relevant where the condition was imposed on the visa you are applying on the basis of. It is not a free-floating extra criterion, and it is not the whole of the 887 test either — the substantive residence and work requirements for the 887 sit in the Migration Regulations and are a separate question from this instrument.
What that means in practice is that your years in a designated area are not merely a condition you complied with. They are evidence you will one day have to produce. The 489 closed to new applications back in 2019, so most people still holding one are near the end of a long provisional period — which is exactly when patchy record-keeping from four years ago starts to hurt.
Evidence worth having in order now, not later
0/7 doneFirst: do not move on the strength of a postcode list you found on a forum. NSW and Queensland are cut by postcode ranges, and a suburb one range over is simply not a designated area. Second: if you are contemplating a move, a job change or a period outside Australia while condition 8549 applies to you, get advice before you commit — not after, when the only available remedy is an explanation.
What to do about the citation change
This is small, but it is the one genuinely new thing to action.
From 22 September 2026, IMMI 16/044 no longer exists. Any document, template, checklist, submission or internal note that cites it is citing a repealed instrument. If you are an applicant assembling a file, or an adviser maintaining precedents, the correct citation is now:
Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 (LIN 26/004), F2026L01255, registered 21 September 2026.
The areas behind that citation are unchanged, so nothing about your position moves. But a submission that cites a repealed instrument invites a question you would rather not have to answer.
Most legislative instruments that frighten people turn out to be housekeeping. The skill is telling the difference quickly — and then not wasting the client's money on the ones that are. This one is housekeeping. The postcode list underneath it is what actually deserves your attention.
Where this sits in the wider picture
If you are researching regional pathways more broadly, the modern equivalents of this framework are the subclass 491 and 494 visas, which use the separate "designated regional area" concept — start with our 190 vs 491 comparison and the choosing your state guide. For a worked regional-to-PR progression, see the Tasmania 491 to 191 pathway. And if a provisional visa has gone sideways, our refusal recovery guidance covers the options.
Primary sources
- Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026 (LIN 26/004), F2026L01255 — made 18 September 2026, registered 21 September 2026, commenced 22 September 2026.
- Explanatory Statement to F2026L01255, registered 21 September 2026 — purpose, the condition 8549 link, the sunsetting rationale and the disallowance exemption.
- Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), regulation 1.03 — the definition of "designated area" under which the instrument is made.
- Legislation Act 2003 (Cth), sections 42 and 50 — disallowance and sunsetting.
- Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), subsection 33(3) — the power to repeal an instrument.
This article provides general information about an Australian legislative instrument and the visa condition it supports. It is not migration advice for any particular person. Whether condition 8549 is imposed on your visa, whether a given address falls within a designated area, and whether you satisfy the criteria for any visa are questions that depend on your own facts and on the law applicable at the relevant time. Migration legislation and legislative instruments change. Obtain advice on your own circumstances before making decisions about where you live, work or study, or before lodging an application.
Wondering how this applies to your situation?
Get an honest, no-obligation read on your pathway from a MARA-registered agent.
People also ask
What is the Migration (Designated Areas) Instrument 2026?
It is a legislative instrument made by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship under the definition of "designated area" in regulation 1.03 of the Migration Regulations 1994. Its departmental reference is LIN 26/004 and its register ID is F2026L01255. It was made on 18 September 2026, registered on 21 September 2026 and commenced on 22 September 2026, the day after registration.
Did the designated areas actually change on 22 September 2026?
No. The Explanatory Statement states that section 6 and the Schedule 1 table were each "remade in substantially the same form" as the corresponding provisions of the repealed Designated Areas 2016/044 (IMMI 16/044). The postcodes, States and Territories are the same. What changed is the instrument that carries them.
Why was the instrument remade at all?
Because the old one was about to expire. Under section 50 of the Legislation Act 2003 legislative instruments automatically sunset roughly ten years after they are made. The Explanatory Statement records that IMMI 16/044 was scheduled to sunset on 1 October 2026. Remaking it kept an instrument behind the definition of "designated area" so that condition 8549 continued to point at a valid list.
What does condition 8549 require?
In the Explanatory Statement's words, a visa holder subject to condition 8549 "must live, work and study in an area specified as a designated area of Australia". All three activities are named, and they all point at the same geographic list.
Which visas does condition 8549 apply to?
The Explanatory Statement describes it as relevant to the operation of "some visa subclasses, including Subclass 489 and Subclass 887". The word "including" means the list is not closed — holders of older provisional skilled visas should check their own grant notification rather than assuming. Conditions are imposed case by case, so the only reliable answer for any individual is what appears on their visa grant notification or in VEVO.
How do I know if condition 8549 is on my visa?
Check your visa grant notification letter, or look your visa up in VEVO (Visa Entitlement Verification Online). Visa conditions are imposed on a case-by-case basis and no article, list or forum post can tell you which conditions attach to your particular grant.
Which areas are designated areas?
The entire Australian Capital Territory, Norfolk Island, the Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia. New South Wales qualifies by postcode excluding Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong (2311–2312, 2328–2333, 2336–2490, 2535–2551, 2575–2739, 2787–2898). Queensland qualifies by postcode excluding the Brisbane metropolitan area (4019–4028, 4037–4050, 4079–4100, 4114, 4118, 4124–4150, 4158–4168, 4180–4899).
Is Melbourne a designated area?
Under this instrument, Victoria is listed in its entirety as a designated area, so Melbourne falls within it for the purposes of the regulation 1.03 definition and condition 8549. Note carefully that this is a different question from whether Melbourne is a "designated regional area" for subclass 491 or 494 purposes — it is not, and those visas use a separate instrument and a separate list.
What is the difference between a "designated area" and a "designated regional area"?
They are separate legal terms with separate instruments behind them. "Designated area" is defined in regulation 1.03 and specified by this instrument; it supports condition 8549 and is relevant to subclasses including the 489 and 887, and it includes all of Victoria and all of Western Australia. "Designated regional area" is the concept used for the modern subclass 491 and 494 regional visas and excludes Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. Applying one list to the other's obligation is a serious error.
Does this instrument change my Subclass 887 eligibility?
No. It specifies the areas, in the same terms as before. The Explanatory Statement notes that compliance with condition 8549 is relevant to eligibility for the grant of a Subclass 887 visa where the applicant applies on the basis of holding a visa on which condition 8549 was imposed. The substantive criteria for the 887 sit in the Migration Regulations and are a separate question from this instrument.
Can this instrument be disallowed by Parliament?
No. The Explanatory Statement records that it is exempt from disallowance under section 42 of the Legislation Act 2003, because it is made under Part 1 of the Migration Regulations, which is exempt under paragraph (b) of item 20 in regulation 10 of the Legislation (Exemptions and Other Matters) Regulation 2015. As a consequence, a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights was not required.
Do I need to do anything because of this instrument?
For most people, nothing — the areas are unchanged. Two things are worth doing anyway: confirm that every address you have lived at during your provisional period actually falls within the Schedule 1 list, and update any document, checklist or submission that still cites IMMI 16/044, which was repealed on 22 September 2026.
